The submission references a legitimate and high-quality research laboratory (NESLab at Politecnico di Milano) but the specific project 'StarStone' appears unverifiable or non-existent. The submission contains significant red flags, including demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product') and nonsensical financial data ('marketcap: 500000'). While the underlying academic entity is reputable and innovative in the IoT space, the submission itself lacks credibility and appears to be a low-effort or student test entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline