The submission describes the legitimate Dutch Emissions Authority (NEa), a critical government agency for climate policy and emissions trading. While the entity possesses immense real-world utility and regulatory authority, the submission itself is of low quality, containing factually incorrect claims regarding 'marketcap' and user traction ('everyone'). The project scores highly on utility and relevance but is penalized for lack of technical detail and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline