The submission suffers from critical data integrity issues, including a mismatch between the Project Name ('WhisperForge') and the Description/URL ('NavFeas'). While 'navfeas.com' represents a legitimate environmental consultancy, the submission contains hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., Reach: 'everyone', Traction: 'most people have used my product'). The revenue metric is non-standard ('all time marketcap') and inconsistent with the claimed team size of 30. The score reflects the potential of the underlying business severely penalized by the low-quality, contradictory, and unreliable submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline