The submission represents Nationwide, a Fortune 100 insurance and financial services giant. While the entity itself commands immense real-world utility, reach, and traction (placing it in the highest calibration tier), the specific submission provided is of extremely low quality. Key fields contain vague, unprofessional, or inaccurate data (e.g., Launch Date 1985 vs 1926, 'most people have used my product', 'marketcap: null'). The score reflects the massive undeniable scale of the business, significantly penalized by the lack of specific project evidence, technical innovation, and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline