The submission for Nanta Technology lacks credible evidence and contains significant data quality issues. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is unsubstantiated and highly improbable for a small B2B entity (11-50 employees). The technology stack lists 'social-media' for a hardware manufacturing business, indicating a mismatch or lack of technical detail. The email address provided is invalid, and the project description consists of generic corporate buzzwords without specific product details, patents, or verification of the 'Make in India' initiative participation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline