The submission describes Nanosoft Technologies, a verifiable IT services company based in Pakistan (founded 2005) with approximately 150 employees. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, containing hyperbolic and likely false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone'). While the business itself appears to be a legitimate SME with a long operating history, the Proof of Usefulness score is heavily penalized by the lack of specific product details, the discrepancy between the submitted claims and reality, and the confused metrics (e.g., misusing 'market cap' for a private service firm).
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline