The project appears to be a consulting firm (service-based) rather than a technology product. Crucially, the domain 'naamea.com' returns no search index results despite a claimed launch date of 2004. The submission contains significant red flags, including the implausible claim that 'most people have used my product' for a niche B2B consultancy, and 'everyone' as the target audience. The revenue field is misused for a 'marketcap' figure. Due to lack of verifiable existence, zero technical innovation, and low-quality data entry, the Proof of Usefulness is negligible.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline