The project appears to be a niche legal consultancy rather than a scalable technology product. The submission quality is extremely low, containing nonsensical claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and invalid data fields. While the underlying service (compliance for digital health) has market relevance, the lack of verifiable traction, technology, or credible details results in a near-zero score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline