The project 'N26' is a verifiable, major European neobank with significant real-world utility and traction (Unicorn status, ~$9B peak valuation, ~8M users). However, the submission quality is exceptionally poor, containing informal language ('BlazeWalker', 'most people have used my product'), hyperbolic claims, and data discrepancies (listing 300M as market cap rather than likely revenue, and conflicting team sizes). Despite the low-quality submission, the entity's established market presence necessitates a high score, albeit penalized for the lack of direct evidence provided in the form.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline