The submission represents Mutual of Omaha, a major Fortune 500 insurance provider with massive real-world utility and reach. While the entity's actual market position would warrant a near-perfect score in utility and traction, the submission itself is of extremely poor quality (vague claims like 'everyone', no technical details). The score is heavily buoyed by the verifiable legacy and scale of the company (URL/Brand) but significantly penalized for the lack of specific evidence, low technical innovation description, and lazy response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline