The project is a verified, traditional architecture practice in Newcastle, UK, not a technology startup. The submission is of extremely low quality, containing false claims ('audienceReach': 'everyone', 'traction': 'most people have used my product') and confusing financial data ('marketcap' for a private micro-entity). While the business exists and provides utility in the construction sector, it lacks the technical innovation, scalable reach, or verifiable traction required for a high Proof of Usefulness score in a technology context.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline