The submission represents a standard web design agency but is heavily penalized for extremely poor response quality and hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product'). While the business appears to have existed since 2012, the input lacks concrete data, confusing 'market cap' with revenue/valuation, and fails to demonstrate any technical differentiation or verifiable traction relative to the 'everyone' audience claim.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline