The submission contains highly hyperbolic and unverifiable claims, specifically that 'most people have used my product,' which is factually incorrect for a project with no significant search presence. The revenue metric ('marketcap: 500000') is ambiguous and misused. Technical descriptions are vague, listing 'Museums & Institutions' as technologies. The project lacks credible evidence of traction, utility, or innovation matching the claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline