The submission references a legitimate and high-value initiative (Munich Quantum Valley); however, the submission data itself appears to be spam or extremely low-effort. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a quantum computing research project. The disconnect between the reputable entity (MQV) and the fraudulent nature of the traction claims ('everyone' audience, null revenue, 'ThunderBlade' alias) results in a severe penalty. The score reflects the lack of credible evidence provided in the input, despite the theoretical value of the underlying organization.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline