The submission contains significant red flags, including the statistically impossible claim that 'most people have used my product' for a company with 6 employees and a 500,000 market cap. The description relies on generic industry buzzwords (AI, IoT, Robotics) without describing a specific product or use case. The project appears to be a small, local IT services or student project guidance firm rather than a scalable product. The lack of verifiable traction, combined with hyperbolic audience reach claims, results in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline