The project appears to be a standard, small-scale recruitment consultancy (Morgan Mace) with a potentially outdated or low-traffic digital presence. The submission suffers significantly from unverifiable and hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience: everyone'), poor data quality (market cap vs revenue confusion), and a lack of technological innovation. While the service itself has basic real-world utility, the evidence provided suggests minimal traction relative to the industry, resulting in a score reflecting a low-impact or early-stage SME with critical submission flaws.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline