The submission describes a legitimate, albeit small, civil engineering firm specializing in aviation infrastructure (MDG Inc.). However, the input data contains significant discrepancies and red flags when cross-referenced with public records. While the user claims a team size of 125, the firm's own website lists a team of 13. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect for a specialized B2B service provider. Additionally, the revenue field conflates 'market cap' with revenue, indicating low response quality. The score reflects the existence of the business but penalizes the gross exaggerations and lack of verifiable traction data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline