The submission contains significant red flags, most notably the demonstrably false claim that 'most people have used my product' while the domain 'mlhs.ink' has no discernable search engine footprint or active web presence. While the concept of a DeSci (Decentralized Science) platform for clinicians has theoretical merit, the lack of verifiable evidence, the use of placeholder-like text for traction, and the unsubstantiated team size of 30 result in a negative score. The project appears to be either a concept with hyperbolic claims or a low-quality entry lacking real-world grounding.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline