The project 'Mintable' is a verified, established NFT marketplace with significant historical volume and backing (e.g., Mark Cuban), placing it in the 'Much larger scale' category. However, the submission quality is critically poor, featuring hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), missing metrics, and a lack of verifiable evidence in the text. Consequently, while the Utility and Innovation scores reflect the platform's actual capabilities (gasless minting), the Reach, Traction, and Response Quality scores are heavily penalized due to the vagueness and unprofessionalism of the submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline