The submission for 'Mindloggers' (or 'StarHeart') presents significant credibility issues. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a niche IT services consultancy. The revenue field cites a 'marketcap: 50000' without currency or context, indicating a lack of serious financial tracking or extremely early stage. The description is a generic list of IT keywords (recruitment, SAP, Salesforce) without any evidence of unique value, proprietary technology, or verifiable traction. The 'everyone' target audience is unrealistic. This submission scores very low due to unsubstantiated hyperbolic claims and lack of verifiable proof of utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline