The submission appears to be a personal portfolio/consulting website ('MindForIT') rather than a scalable technology product. The input data contains significant inconsistencies, such as the name 'BlazeKeeper' (unrelated to the URL) and hyperbolic traction claims ('most people have used my product') which are demonstrably false. The 'marketcap' figure likely refers to cumulative consulting revenue or is erroneous, as no public token or company valuation exists. While the website represents a valid professional service, it scores extremely low on the PoU scale due to lack of scalable utility, false traction signals, and poor submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline