The submission for 'MILI' contains critical red flags and unverifiable claims. While the concept of AI for wealth management is relevant, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a niche B2B tool. The stated team size of 125 employees contradicts the complete lack of digital footprint (no search results for the domain or company). The revenue field cites 'marketcap', suggesting a potential crypto project or misunderstanding of metrics, but provides no verifiable data. The project appears to be in a conceptual phase with exaggerated submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline