The submission for MiApple lacks credibility due to hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone'). There is no specific technical innovation described, as 'marketing' is listed as the only technology. Despite a stated 2015 launch, there is zero evidence of traction, revenue is listed as 'null', and the response quality is extremely low. The project appears to be a generic service agency with no verifiable digital footprint or differentiation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline