The project 'Metavoicer' appears to be a legitimate text-to-speech application with verifiable mobile traction (estimated 100K-1M+ downloads). However, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), irrelevant metadata ('construction' tag), and a lack of verifiable internal metrics. While external search confirms the product exists and has market relevance, the submission fails to professionally demonstrate its value, resulting in a heavily penalized score due to the 'Proof' aspect of the methodology.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline