Proof of Usefulness Report

Metaverse Architects

Analysis completed on 1/25/2026

+55
Proof of Usefulness Score
You're In Business

While 'Metaverse Architects' is a verifiable agency with a legitimate portfolio (e.g., Sotheby's Decentraland replica, Metaverse Architecture Biennale), the submission itself is of critically low quality. Claims such as 'Audience: everyone' and 'Traction: most people have used my product' are objectively false and hyperbolic. The project solves a genuine B2B problem in the Web3 space, but the lack of accurate data, the submission of 'CrimsonHeart' (likely a specific game or typo) as the name, and the refusal to provide serious metrics results in a low score despite the agency's real-world existence.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+75
Real World Utility Quality+1
Audience Reach Impact+40
Audience Reach Impact Quality+0.5
Technical Innovation+60
Technical Innovation Quality+1
Evidence Of Traction+70
Evidence Of Traction Quality+0.5
Market Timing Relevance+40
Market Timing Relevance Quality+1
Functional Completeness+10
Response Quality Quality+0.5
Subtotal+51
Usefulness Multiplierx1.08
Final Score+55

Project Details

Description
Metaverse Architectsis in the Virtual Reality Industry

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Growing utility with room for optimization
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline