The submission for 'MetaPax' contains significant red flags, most notably the false claim that 'most people have used my product'. While the concept of smart glasses for remote guidance (remote assistance) has genuine industrial utility, the project itself appears to be a low-traction or dormant crypto-related venture (launch date 2021) with no verifiable user base. The input data is poor (typos, null revenue, fake traction claims), and search results indicate the project has not achieved mainstream adoption, contradicting the submission's claims. The score reflects the valid underlying concept but heavily penalizes the lack of evidence, false claims, and poor submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline