Proof of Usefulness Report

MetaPax

Analysis completed on 1/6/2026

+53
Proof of Usefulness Score
You're In Business

The submission for 'MetaPax' contains significant red flags, most notably the false claim that 'most people have used my product'. While the concept of smart glasses for remote guidance (remote assistance) has genuine industrial utility, the project itself appears to be a low-traction or dormant crypto-related venture (launch date 2021) with no verifiable user base. The input data is poor (typos, null revenue, fake traction claims), and search results indicate the project has not achieved mainstream adoption, contradicting the submission's claims. The score reflects the valid underlying concept but heavily penalizes the lack of evidence, false claims, and poor submission quality.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+37
Audience Reach Impact+1
Technical Innovation+7
Evidence Of Traction+0
Market Timing Relevance+10
Functional Completeness+2
Subtotal+58
Usefulness Multiplierx0.9
Final Score+53

Project Details

Project URL
Description
MetaPaxis in the Wearable Technology Industry
Audience Reach
everyone
Target Users
everyone
Technologies
Developer Tools
Traction Evidence
most people have used my product

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Growing utility with room for optimization
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline