The submission for 'Metafic' presents significant contradictions between claimed metrics and verifiable reality. While external search confirms Metafic exists as a B2B IT services agency with a modest presence on Clutch (11 reviews), the submission itself contains demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' for a B2B firm) and confusing financial data ('all time marketcap: 75000000'). The submitter name ('BlazeBlade') and the audience definition ('everyone') indicate a low-effort or spam-like entry. The project is a standard staff augmentation business, not a high-growth technology product, and the PoU score is heavily penalized for the lack of credible evidence and the poor quality of the submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline