The project submission suffers significantly from credibility issues, notably the claim that 'most people have used my product,' which is factually incorrect for a niche Web3 gaming project with a $2.5M market cap. While the project appears to exist as a low-cap cryptocurrency entity, the input data provides minimal evidence of real-world utility, innovation, or sustainable traction. The confusion between market cap and revenue, combined with hyperbolic audience claims, results in a low score reflecting 'Minimal Traction' with potential red flags.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline