The project represents a legacy executive search consultancy (established 1991) rather than a technology product. While the business appears legitimate and long-standing, the submission quality is extremely poor, containing demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' for a niche B2B service) and lacking any technological innovation. The 'technologies used' field lists 'Human Resources,' confirming a lack of tech stack relevance. The score reflects a non-tech service business evaluated within a technology framework, heavily penalized for inaccurate data and unrealistic reach claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline