The submission for Mental PRO addresses a relevant topic (corporate mental health) but lacks credibility due to exaggerated claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and a lack of verifiable data. The technical description is non-existent, listing generic concepts rather than a tech stack. With no evidence of traction, revenue, or specific user metrics, the project scores very low, reflecting an early-stage concept or consultancy with minimal digital proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline