The project represents a legitimate social impact initiative (Menstrual Cycle Support, likely the UK-based entity) with high potential utility in health education. However, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product') and ambiguous metrics ('marketcap: 500000'). While external verification suggests genuine value and NHS partnerships, the lack of concrete evidence in the submission and the unrealistic reach claims significantly penalize the final score, placing it in the 'Minimal Traction' calibration tier.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline