The project appears to be a legitimate student-run society and hackathon (MedTech Sheffield) established in 2016. However, the submission quality is critically low, containing demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'marketcap 2,500,000'). While the underlying initiative has educational value and local traction within the University of Sheffield ecosystem, the exaggerated metrics and lack of verifiable technical detail in this submission result in a severe penalty to the score. It falls into the 'Minimal traction' or 'Red flag' category due to the unreliability of the provided data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline