The submission describes a B2B medical consultancy service ('Medtech GTP') rather than a technology product. The entry contains significant red flags, including verifiable false claims regarding traction ('most people have used my product') and audience reach ('everyone'), which contradict the specialized nature of medical trade. Additionally, the 'name' field ('DeepClaw') mismatches the project name, suggesting a careless or copy-pasted submission. With no custom technology and unverifiable revenue metrics ('marketcap: 500000'), the project scores extremely low on the Proof of Usefulness scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline