The submission describes a MedTech consulting firm but contains critical inconsistencies and red flags. While the text description outlines a valid service model, the input fields claim the audience is 'everyone' (contradicting the niche B2B focus) and assert that 'most people have used my product,' which is factually impossible. The project name 'GoldenHunter' clashes with the business name 'MEDDSales'. With zero technical innovation cited and low-quality responses, this submission scores extremely low on the Proof of Usefulness scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline