The project appears to be a standard niche management consultancy rather than a technology product. The submission contains demonstrably false claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product'), which severely undermines credibility. While the core service (Medical Affairs) has real-world utility in the pharma sector, the lack of technological innovation, ambiguous revenue metrics ('marketcap' for a service business), and poor response quality result in a very low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline