The project appears to be a standard digital consultancy service based in Australia. However, the submission contains significant discrepancies and hyperbolic claims that severely undermine credibility. Specifically, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually impossible, and the financial metric labeled 'all time marketcap' of 2.5M relative to a 30-person team suggests either data error or inflated headcount (implies ~$20k revenue per employee over 4 years). The description relies on buzzwords rather than specific service details. While the business likely provides utility to a local client base, the submission quality and lack of verifiable evidence result in a low Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline