The submission describes a GIS/Geospatial consulting firm with claims of significant industry experience (23+ years), yet the provided evidence is contradictory and unprofessional. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect for a niche B2B consultancy, and 'audience reach: everyone' further diminishes credibility. The revenue figure ('marketcap: 500000') is ambiguous and suggests a small scale operation compared to the reference baseline. While the service offerings (Digital Twins, IoT) are relevant, the lack of verifiable traction and the hyperbolic nature of the submission result in a low Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline