The submission represents a well-established, large-scale entity (Market America/SHOP.COM), but the application quality is critically low. The submission contains hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (e.g., audience is 'everyone', 'most people have used my product') and nonsensical data (revenue listed as 'all time marketcap: 1000000001'). While the underlying business has significant real-world utility and traction, the specific project submission fails to provide credible evidence, specific technical details, or accurate metrics, resulting in a low score driven by the poor quality of input.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline