The submission appears to be a low-effort entry for a verifiable but small non-profit entity (Tesserakt Institute). While the organization exists and has received minor government grants (e.g., $5,000 for COVID relief), the submission is critically flawed. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is factually false and matches a pattern of spam submissions. The description is dated (COVID-19 focus), and the financial metric ('all time marketcap: 500000') is incoherent for a standard non-profit. The discrepancy between the project name 'MarCom Institute' and the description 'HelpHub' further reduces credibility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline