The submission describes a civil contracting and indigenous employment initiative ('Maramara' and 'REGROUP') rather than a technology project. The provided URL (maramara.com.au) yields no search results or web presence. Claims of traction ('most people have used my product') are hyperbolic and unverifiable. Data inconsistencies (125 team members vs. 50k market cap) and the listing of 'Newspapers' as a technology suggest a low-quality or non-serious submission. No evidence of technical innovation or digital product utility exists.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline