The project lacks a verifiable digital footprint, with the provided domain returning no search results. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is factually unrealistic for an unverified IT staffing agency, constituting a significant credibility red flag. The submission relies on vague marketing language ('everyone', 'revolutionizing lives') without actionable details, revenue data, or team verification. The combination of zero verifiable presence and dubious claims results in a score below zero, per calibration guidelines.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline