The project proposes a sports rating platform ('Maet') but the submission is severely compromised by contradictory data (listed as 'Cybersecurity' and 'Climatetech') and demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product'). While the concept of a 'real-world ELO rating' has utility, the lack of verifiable evidence, absence of a functional digital footprint, and poor submission quality result in a low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline