The project is a local brick-and-mortar optometry and sports vision business rather than a scalable technology platform. While it provides high real-world utility in its specific geography (Louisville), the submission fails to demonstrate technical innovation or broad audience reach. The claims regarding traction ('most people have used my product') and reach ('everyone') are hyperbolic and unverifiable, resulting in low quality factors. The submission lacks specific metrics on revenue or active users, placing it in the lowest tier of the calibration scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline