The project submission relies on grandiose, unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'Apple of blockchain') that contradict the reported team size of 1 and lack of revenue. The project description is a disorganized collection of buzzwords ('Web5', 'Linktree blockchain', 'MetaVegas') without a clear technical implementation plan or focused value proposition. The claim of universal audience reach is factually unsupported, and the submission lacks any credible evidence of traction or functionality, resulting in a near-zero score reflecting a high likelihood of being a concept-only or spam submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline