The submission for 'Lunge Systems' (lunge.ai) presents a productivity concept but provides no verifiable evidence of existence or adoption. The claim that 'most people have used my product' appears objectively false or hyperbolic given the lack of revenue, active users, or digital footprint. The project is penalized heavily for low credibility, vague technical descriptions, and poor response quality, positioning it as a conceptual or test entry rather than a functional business.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline