The submission represents Lowe's, a massive Fortune 50 home improvement retailer with indisputable real-world utility and market reach. However, the submission quality is extremely poor (generic description, 'null' revenue data, lazy evidence of traction). While the entity itself warrants a high score based on scale and verification of public data (300k+ employees, billions in revenue), the project score is penalized significantly for lack of technical innovation details and the low-effort nature of the response. The 'climatetech' and 'social-media' tags appear loosely applied without supporting technical context.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline