Proof of Usefulness Report

Lorica

Analysis completed on 1/25/2026

+42
Proof of Usefulness Score
You're In Business

The submission suffers from significant discrepancies and quality issues. While 'Lorica' appears to be a legitimate name in the privacy sector (referring to either Lorica Identity or Lorica Cybersecurity), the submission conflates the two: using the URL/email of the former (Identity/Credentials) with the description of the latter (Privacy Enhancing AI/FHE). Furthermore, the traction claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a niche B2B privacy tool, severely damaging credibility. The input lacks verifiable data on revenue or users, resulting in a minimal score despite the potential utility of the underlying technology.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+50
Audience Reach Impact+10
Technical Innovation+50
Evidence Of Traction+10
Market Timing Relevance+60
Functional Completeness+10
Subtotal+34.25
Usefulness Multiplierx1.2
Final Score+41

Project Details

Description
Loricais in the Cybersecurity Industry

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Growing utility with room for optimization
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline