The submission contains highly contradictory data (30 employees vs. $50k 'marketcap') and hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). The project description uses non-standard phrasing ('mitigating trickery') and generic claims about serving financial institutions without providing specific evidence or verifiable case studies. The response quality is low, indicating either a lack of serious metrics or a potential spam submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline