The project represents a legitimate existing marketing agency (Localis) established in 2010 with verifiable operations. However, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by unprofessional details ('ShadowFang'), hyperbolic claims ('everyone', 'most people have used my product'), and confused financial metrics ('all time marketcap' likely referring to lifetime revenue). While the company appears to have a moderate team size and operational history, the lack of verifiable evidence, absence of technical innovation, and poor response quality result in a score reflecting minimal proven usefulness in this context.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline