The submission contains a critical inconsistency: the project name 'LiveDocs' refers to a data storytelling tool (verified via Y Combinator association), but the description provided describes 'AfterClass', a separate student document tool. Additionally, the traction claim 'most people have used my product' is objectively false and damages credibility. While the underlying technology of the verified LiveDocs platform is promising, the submission's incoherent data, incorrect description, and hyperbolic claims result in a severely penalized score indicative of minimal verified usefulness based on the provided input.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline